SECOND-ORDER TRANSFERENCE: ACTIVATION OF THE PARENT 1 EGO STATE IN THE CLIENT’S INTERACTION WITH AN AI CHAT SYSTEM

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32782/3041-2005/2026-2.55

Keywords:

Transactional Analysis, second-order transference, Parent ego state, artificial intelligence, digital interaction, projection, psychotherapy

Abstract

The article presents a theoretical conceptualization of second-order transference as a process of activation of the Parent 1 ego state in the client’s interaction with an artificial intelligence-based chat system. The relevance of the study is determined by the rapid spread of generative digital systems in the field of mental health and by the insufficient theoretical elaboration of the psychological mechanisms underlying such interaction within the framework of Transactional Analysis. The aim of the article is to examine how an algorithmic system may become an object of projection of internal parental introjects and perform the function of a symbolically significant Other in a person’s psychic life. The methodological basis of the study is the transactional-analytic approach; the methods used include theoretical analysis, categorical analysis, comparative-interpretative analysis, and conceptual modelling. It is shown that Transactional Analysis provides a productive framework for studying digital transference because it makes it possible to analyse interaction with an artificial intelligence-based chat system at the structural, transactional, script-related, and relational levels. The article substantiates that, under certain conditions, an algorithmic system may be perceived not only as an instrument for information processing but also as a projection surface for the activation of either the nurturing or the critical pole of Parent 1. It is established that such interaction is ambivalent in nature: in its nurturing dimension, it may contribute to the temporary stabilization of the Adult ego state, reduction of anxiety, and structuring of inner experience, whereas in its critical dimension, it may intensify dependence on external validation, reinforce script patterns, and reduce autonomy. Special attention is paid to the phenomenon of the “artificial Third” as a new element of the psychotherapeutic field that transforms the configuration of interaction “client – artificial intelligence-based chat system – therapist.” The practical significance of the findings lies in creating a theoretical basis for further empirical studies and for the psychotherapeutic interpretation of digitally mediated forms of contact

References

Шлегель Л. Короткий словник транзакційного аналізу / упоряд. перекладач Г. Яворська, К. Репетій. Черкаси : Інтроліта ТОР, 2025. 608 с.

Яворська Г. Діагностика симбіотичних відносин: транзакційно-аналітичний підхід до розмежування здорових та патологічних форм. Психологічний журнал, (15), 144–153. https://doi.org/10.31499/2617-2100.15.2025.342185

Яворський М. В. Психологічні детермінанти довіри до штучного інтелекту. Ментальне здоров’я, № 4 (2025). DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/3041-2005/2025-4.42

Alabed A., Javornik A., Gregory-Smith D. AI anthropomorphism and its effect on users’ self-congruence and self-AI integration: A theoretical framework and research agenda. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2022. Vol. 182. Art. 121786. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121786

Berne E. Transactional analysis in psychotherapy: A systematic individual and social psychiatry. New York: Grove Press, 1961. 270 p.

Chen Y., Wang M., Yuan S., Zhao Y. Development and validation of the conversational AI dependence scale for Chinese college students. Frontiers in Psychology. 2025. Vol. 16. Art. 1621540. DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1621540

Erskine R. G. Transference and Transactions: Critique from an Intrapsychic and Integrative Perspective.Transactional Analysis

Journal. 1991. Vol. 21, No. 2. P. 63–76. DOI: 10.1177/036215379102100202

Gillath O., Ai T., Branicky M. S., Keshmiri S., Davison R. B., Spaulding R. Attachment and trust in artificial intelligence. Computers in Human Behavior. 2021. Vol. 115. Art. 106607. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2020.106607

Goh A. Y. H., Hartanto A., Majeed N. M. Generative artificial intelligence dependency: Scale development, validation, and its motivational, behavioral, and psychological correlates. Computers in Human Behavior Reports. 2025. Vol. 20. Art. 100845. DOI: 10.1016/j.chbr.2025.100845

Haber Y., Levkovich I., Hadar-Shoval D., Elyoseph Z. The Artificial Third: A Broad View of the Effects of Introducing Generative Artificial Intelligence on Psychotherapy.JMIR Mental Health. 2024. Vol. 11. Art. e54781. DOI: 10.2196/54781

Haworth M. Generative Artificial Intelligence Use in Transactional Analysis Psychotherapy: Transference With the Artificial Third. Transactional Analysis Journal. 2026. Vol. 56. No. 1. P. 30–49. DOI: 10.1080/03621537.2026.2595388

Hu D., Lan Y., Yan H., Chen C. W. What makes you attached to social companion AI? A two-stage exploratory mixed-method study. International Journal of Information Management. 2025. Vol. 83. Art. 102890. DOI:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2025.102890

Kasturiratna K. T. A. S., Hartanto A. Attachment to artificial intelligence: Development of the AI Attachment Scale, construct validation, and the psychological mechanisms of human-AI attachment. Computers in Human Behavior Reports. 2025. Vol. 21. Art. 100912. DOI: 10.1016/j.chbr.2025.100912

Li H., Zhang R., Lee Y.-C., Kraut R. E., Mohr D. C. Systematic review and meta-analysis of AI-based conversational agents for promoting mental health and well-being. NPJ Digital Medicine. 2023. Vol. 6. No. 1. Art. 236. DOI: 10.1038/s41746-023-00979-5

Moiso C. Ego States and Transference. Transactional Analysis Journal. 1985. Vol. 15. No. 3. P. 194–201. DOI: 10.1177/036215378501500302

Pentina I., Hancock T., Xie T. Exploring relationship development with social chatbots: A mixed-method study of Replika. Computers in Human Behavior. 2023. Vol. 140. Art. 107600. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2022.107600

Saracini C., Cornejo-Plaza M. I., Cippitani R. Techno-emotional projection in human-GenAI relationships: A psychological and ethical conceptual perspective. Frontiers in Psychology. 2025. Vol. 16. Art. 1662206. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1662206

Yang F., Oshio A. Using attachment theory to conceptualize and measure the experiences in human-AI relationships. Current Psychology. 2025. Vol. 44. P. 10658–10669. DOI: 10.1007/s12144-025-07917-6

Published

2026-05-21

Issue

Section

Статті