EVALUATING THE WELL-BEING OF MEDICAL FACULTY STAFF UNDER PSYCHOLOGICAL DISTRESS

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32782/3041-2005/2025-3.12

Keywords:

medical faculty staff, distress, psychological well-being, factors

Abstract

The article analyses the level of well-being among scientific and pedagogical workers of a medical university under conditions of varying levels of psychological distress. In accordance with the set goal, the logical scheme of the study and the set of methods used, which determined the methodology of the experimental study, are described. In 33.33 % of scientific and pedagogical workers of higher medical education institutions, a normal psychological state is observed, in 27.08 % – mild psychological distress, in 15.63 % – moderate psychological distress, and in 23.96 % – severe psychological distress. Moderate psychological distress is most common among young women (93.33 %) (median age 39) with less work experience (median 12 years). Severe psychological distress is more common in women (78.26 %), with age and work experience in this group significantly higher than in the moderate distress group. An analysis of the psychological well-being of scientific and pedagogical workers shows that the most pronounced indicators are ‘personal growth’ and ‘self-acceptance.’ It has been established that at a mild level of distress among NPPs, individuals are predominantly diagnosed with an average level of personal growth (42.86 %) and environmental management (53.57 %), below average levels of self-acceptance (46.4 %) and autonomy (46.43 %), while a nearly equal distribution of below-average and above-average values was characteristic of life goals and autonomy. With moderate distress among NPPs, individuals with high levels of autonomy (42.86 %), life goals (71.43 %), and positive relationships with others (50.00 %) were predominantly diagnosed, while low self-acceptance scores were characteristic of 42.86 % of respondents. An analysis of the levels of psychological well-being indicators in cases of severe distress among NPs revealed that the following indicators of psychological well-being were lower than others in the study sample: personal growth (41.67 % of respondents had a high level of manifestation) and environmental control (50.00 % of respondents). The results emphasize the need for targeted interventions to help medical teachers maintain a sense of control and support their psychological resilience. The results obtained emphasise the need for targeted interventions to help medical teachers maintain a sense of control and support their psychological resilience.

References

Lai J., Ma S., Wang Y., Cai Z., Hu J., Wei N., et al. Factors associated with mental health outcomes among health care workers exposed to coronavirus disease 2019. JAMA Network Open. 2020. № 3 (3). Р. e203976. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3976

Pappa S., Ntella V., Giannakas T., Giannakoulis V. G., Papoutsi E., Katsaounou P. Prevalence of depression, anxiety, and insomnia in healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Brain, Behavior, and Immunity. 2020. № 88. Р. 901–907. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2020.05.026

Frenzel A. C., Pekrun R., Goetz T., Sutton R. E. Academic emotions in students’ self-regulated learning and achievement: A program of qualitative and quantitative research. Educational Psychologist. 2009. № 44(3). Р. 139–158. doi: 10.1080/00461520903033503

Montgomery A. J., Rupp D. E. A meta-analysis for exploring the relationship between job level, tenure, and job satisfaction. Journal of Managerial Psychology. 2005. № 20 (3/4). Р. 193–217. doi: 10.1108/02683940510589019

Radchenko O., Sliusarenko N., Kizim S. Psychological well-being of Ukrainian educators during the war: Challenges and resources. Problems of Education in the 21st Century. 2022. № 80 (6). Р. 1083–1097. doi: 10.33225/pec/22.80.1083

Rushton C. H., Thomas T. A., Antonsdottir I. M., Nelson K. E., McCabe M. S., Sinclair S., et al. Moral injury and healthcare professionals in the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. 2020. № 60 (2). Р. e11–e16. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.04.039

Шкала психологічного дистресу Кесслера (K10) [Kessler’s psychological distress scale (K10).] EzTests.xyz. URL: http://surl.li/odddi (дата звернення: 01.08.2025).

Карсканова С. В. Опитувальник «Шкали психологічного благополуччя» К. Ріфф: процес та результати адаптації. Практична психологія та соціальна робота. 2011. № 1. С. 1–10.

Pietrabissa G., Simpson S.G., Rossi A., Santangelo G., Kolacz J., Vegni E., et al. Psychological wellbeing among healthcare professionals facing the COVID-19 emergency. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2020. № 9(4). Р. 1146. doi: 10.3390/jcm9041146

Aparicio-Zaldivar M., Castellanos-Torres E., Espinoza-Cifuentes C., Mena-Rojas S., Parra-Soto S., Vargas-Hernández J. Psychological distress and post-traumatic growth among healthcare professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic. European Journal of Public Health. 2022. № 32(3). Р. 443–449. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckac030

Søvold L. E., Naslund J. A., Kousoulis A. A., Saxena S., Qoronfleh M. W., Grobler C., et al. The mental health of healthcare workers in the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Public Health. 2021. № 9. Р. 686118. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.686118

Shanafelt T.D., Ripp J., Trockel M. The well-being of physicians and other healthcare professionals. Mayo Clinic Proceedings. 2020. № 95(10). Р. 2244–2263. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2020.05.030

Tawfiq A., Farid M., Musa A., Mohamed R., Musa H., Awooda E. et al. Mental health of healthcare workers in a lowresource setting during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study. BMC Psychiatry. 2021. № 21 (1). Р. 546. doi: 10.1186/s12888-021-03536-7

Published

2025-10-16

Issue

Section

Статті